no politics, it's not worth it. market! it's much more interesting.
national interest – these are healthy reactions to reality and a minimum of fantasies.
today we have added one stack 13%. ALKZ, coke. but they will say, that `` on the news about the cost of gas ''.
this is how it looks like this is on the news. do not judge strictly, stk young still:)
this is the whole story on a normal exchange. 15 minutes. gray vertical stripes – day separators.
and now the real reaction to the news. no kidding. STIR, chemist.
15 minutes. gray vertical stripes – day separators.
Just do, I have a difficult relationship with chemists.
IN 2008 I was very keen on grain, in going from 08 on 09 too. I did not believe in hunger and joked repeatedly with a primitive analysis about, that wheat will be on the highs already in 09. while in the fall 09 I was very bulish in wheat, By the way, like now, although before 600 unlikely to be able to sit out with someone. in general, repeatedly guessed the timing, it means there will be a megalap soon))
I also have a difficult relationship with STIR, the same as with KRAZ)) when no one needed them in February, I fought off colleagues with ideas, u-u-u, kraz bankrupt, u-u-u, yes styrene is generally dead, etc.. ie. it seems like my ideas came true, although they were built through a stump-knee, in the structure of kraz contracts, I have not seen, as well as their reporting, since 07, but the last time I thought about Russia and gas was in August 08.
Eventually. Kind of like bulish in agriculture, och. modestly, but the fact. A plus, fall in love with the stock.
But well, I just can't say, what will we see STIR on 250. so what? strategic issue. We break through 100, do buy, no need here Books wisdom to look and think a lot. Thinking the way you always need to, where close. Actually, what is our risk / reward. So here. In the period up to a year, i see nothing more than 1 to 3 (-20;+60). But on the short, you can trade somewhere 1 to 5 in the hope of lumbago. In general,, sit out at least as significant a loss due to the `` Kharkos articles" I don't see the point at close range.