New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) includes several sector indices, which reflect the productivity of companies in different sectors of the economy. Some of them: – S&P 500: index, which includes 500 largest companies by market capitalization in the United States, covering various sectors of the economy, Such as technology, healthcare, energy, etc.. – Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA): index, which includes 30 largest companies in the USA, representing various sectors of the economy, such as finance, industry, technology, etc. – NASDAQ Composite: index, which includes more than 3000 companies, traded on the NASDAQ exchange, Most of which are companies in the technology sector. – S&P 500 Health Care: index, which includes companies in the healthcare sector, such as manufacturers of pharmaceuticals and medical devices. – S&P 500 Energy: index, which includes companies in the energy sector, such as oil and gas producers, companies manufacturing equipment for the energy industry, etc.
decided to inquire about the site for obvious reasons and came across an entertaining thing , in fact, you will find everything from the link, если вдруг не знаете, I didn't know about it, which is why I have a stable, albeit a mobile psyche.
I never liked the period of the late 90s – early 00s for his overwhelming reasoning about intervention, войнах, new eras and a near-political approach to economic processes. i sincerely hope, that we will not return to this extravaganza. because like the market can be irrational longer, than your ability to pay, so the trends in the reasoning of economists / onolitegs may exist longer, how you save your own brain from irreparable damage.
At that time, such reasoning and such a style are returning to us.
We are very amused by that, With what anger The Economist magazine asks the Western powers, how can they be so friendly with Russia? They are angry, mainly, because, which is quite rightly understood: `` Russia is not like us… Russia does not behave like a respectable European – Russia behaves like… RUSSIA! How dare she?!"
And here The Economist magazine is finally right.. Western powers have really changed their tone: so far, their Russian policy has been completely disastrous, и после того, how, thanks to Anglo-American complicity, relations were completely ruined, the largest EU countries belatedly realized, that they have enough problems even without serious discord within Europe.
And now the French and German delegations one by one replace each other in Moscow literally on a daily basis., and business ties are experiencing a new heyday. Americans also have their own idea of «reboots»: undoubtedly, past those times, when neoconservatives threatened Russia «regime change», and Cheney wanted to bomb the Russian troops approaching Ossetia.
Does our reader remember, that the Orange Revolution was supposed to sweep the streets of Moscow and return Russia to a subordinate state, which the West liked so much in the 1990s.? How Russians were about to rebel against the hated regime and return pro-Western liberals to power, which in the 1990s. worked wonders? How Khodorkovsky prepared to lead his people to the Promised Land? Or from memories of the last time: does our reader remember the angry demands, for Russia to allow Georgia to re-occupy South Ossetia and Abkhazia?
В действительности же, after the destruction of the foundations of the Ukrainian economy, the Orange Revolution and the extremely corrupt Tymoshenko faded into oblivion and gave way to a pro-Russian president, who is doing his best now, to make up for that damage, which the Yushchenko presidency inflicted on Ukrainian-Russian relations.
Meanwhile, the behavior of the mentally unstable Georgian president is becoming more and more bizarre.: recently the country was agitated by fabricated filming, which talk about the Russian invasion and occupation, Saakashvili's death at the hands of the invaders. Нет нужды говорить о том, that it was falsification, invented in the presidential office.
ie. again `` powers '', "запад", `` mentally unstable '', & quot; falsifications" etc. world financial crisis, come back, please…
revision of aset alocation, looks reasonable. but there is the same nbans, as at the beginning of the year. GDP growth is not equal to market growth. an old game of expectations in action.
at 09m – cautious expectations and at the sight of quick recovery – market growth. now we have pretty optimistic expectations, which reality is unlikely to justify.
Technical opinion on VTB on a daily frame can be expressed by LONGS BEWARE. In other words, right shoulder formed, and consequently, possible negative implementation in the relatively near future.
Here is the daily SPX chart, to visualize what to expect in the time zone of 19 March-8 April. 19 Martha, as i assumed, turned out to be a critical day, judging by the magnitude of the fall in comparison with the previous activity. Momentum stopped at the intersection of the vertical line 19 March and purple mini trend line. I personally underestimated, that it should have happened at the mark 1170, thought, which is too early to storm such heights. Assuming, that we have formed a candlestick formation, talking about local top, then support lines immediately appear when a rollback from these heights. Obviously, what a high-speed uptrend line( Green colour) is the main support, as well as the horizontal line of the previous local top in the area 1150-1152. In case of closing below the intersection of these lines, a target for a more substantial support line will open, bottom line of the ascending channel( purple line). One of the negative scenarios is a rollback to the vertical dotted line( fibo zone) this is the area 8 April.
Considering, that the support lines are dynamic, then the tentative goal of such a scenario is to 8 April == 1130. Надо также отметить, that SPX has climbed a bit high relative to many MAs and therefore MAs themselves will be supports and one of the targets of a pullback. Undoubtedly, that this scenario is likely in the absence of any super positive news. Sunday brings us a vote in Congress and therefore this news risk could create an unpredictable reaction in the market.. Надо также отметить, that the end of the quarter is usually tried to close on a positive note window dressing. But the first week of April may be more negative.
As for the MICEX index, then i don't like, that the index is still not above the level 1455-1460 and below the trend line( green Line) while , that the RSI level is high and above 75. This is considered negative divergence.. Therefore, in the event of a correction in the foreign market, testing the area 1300 becomes highly probable. The weekly chart also clearly shows RSI divergence. It should be noted, that the flagships of the Russian market show divergences. With regard to Gazprom, everything has been said before and remains relevant, you can see the charts in the Gazprom tag. If there are no intercessors in Gazprom, then it will be possible to witness the mark 150. Sberbank, although better than Gazprom, but there are divergences on the weekly chart. And if 90 will remain a stumbling block, then " spring unwinding" to the area 55-60 quite likely(this is a pessimistic scenario).
