Picture or pixels? Taxi or checkers?

Sometimes information is visually perceived erroneously. Especially if you select a small part from it and enlarge it under a microscope. For example, take a clear and clear picture on the computer — some image is clearly and clearly visible and you can admire it. But if you enlarge this picture on a computer several times, then we will see some kind of chaos of pixels and this will no longer cause us aesthetic pleasure — shit, not a picture…
The same is true with long-term systems for trading exchange instruments., for example, with the period of the middle position in 20-70 days. I'm not talking about investing or strategies, approaching the concept “bought and keep”.
Here is the equity test against the long-term trend following system for the US futures portfolio.. The relative smoothness of the lines can be admired for a relatively long time. :)

Картинка или пиксели? Такси или шашечки?

What will happen, if we look at any one of twenty years.

001f10gt Картинка или пиксели? Такси или шашечки?

001f20st Картинка или пиксели? Такси или шашечки?

001f3b11 Картинка или пиксели? Такси или шашечки?

It is seen, that the smoothness of the lines in these cases is not necessary to admire. I didn’t look even deeper., for example six months or a month. Even in spite of super-profitable individual market rises, не каждый trader сможет дождаться этих подъемов и закончит играть такую стратегию как раз на дне просадки, unable to bear it.
But who is not a short-term visitor in the market?, for whom the game on the market is not limited to three months to get rich during this time, and who for a long time, that one through 20 years will be able to boast that the average profitability for this period was 100% per annum, while omitting the consideration of the whole picture through the prism of pixels…. :)

  Shadow knows the answer
Scroll to Top