All as one write the same thing.. and I answer all the same. So I'm tired of duplicating.
Everybody says, that nothing will help in limiting losses, except for the type of myself.. Like no locker will help, it can be bypassed if necessary.. At the same time, they do not objectively argue, how it can be circumvented or the argumentation does not stand up to scrutiny.
How can you bypass control from the outside, to which you do not have access? you can't turn it off either?
Everyone advises to understand yourself… Psychologists fuck)))
What will it give?? then? None of your convictions give 100% guarantees… Today they are alone, and when the sure one appears – they are different.
Program control from the outside gives 100% protection and never changes his attitude to the case.
You suggest that I expose myself to the same risk again for the hundredth time.. Gambling addiction cannot be cured. And if you think, that he was allegedly cured, then there are no guarantees and you continue to be at risk.
I suggest that, which eliminates this risk. You say that this is nonsense.
If I had a similar program, which I am talking about, then your maximum loss per day without control i would do a few months with this locker from outside. Moreover, the goal should really be to drain the account in principle.)))))) And this fact, which can be justified mathematically.. This is objective. This is logical.
That, о чем говорите мне – this is from the field of boltology and everything is subjective.. that there is no way to check and confirm.
Tips and solutions from the category “everything that is not done, all goes to good” )))))
I don't believe in this.
I believe in that, which excludes the human factor and any probabilities in general. And this is no longer faith, but knowledge.. which gives confidence and stability. Anything else can be your illusion.
