hopefully: I am reading an article by a certain Abishev D.D.. (PhD student, Kazakh Economic University named after. T. Ryskulova) with the title & quot; FINANCIAL REGULATION AFTER THE CRISIS: FOCUS ON A MACROPRUDENTIAL APPROACH" (the first in the collection by reference).
read: "Widely used today term «macroprudential» as such was first used in a speech by Milton Friedman: «…we are all now – macroprudentialists…» [1]."
Think: stop-stop-stop, what kind of Milton Friedman? and even & quot;«…we are all now – macroprudentialists…»", and even `` was first used ''. I kind of know something about Friedman and about `` we are all now …" (beginning with ""), I also know something about the macroprudential approach and the history of the term :)
Do: follow the link to the source, a little bit, maybe I'm confusing something (what happens to me due to poor memory for details). read the source: "Сlaudio Borio. The macroprudential approach to regulation and supervision. – URL: " – OK, .
Find: "There is now a growing consensus among policymakers and academics that a key element to improve safeguards against financial instability is to strengthen the “macroprudential” orientation of regulatory and supervisory frameworks. Paraphrasing Milton Friedman, one could even say that “we are all macroprudentialists now”. And yet, a decade ago, the term was hardly used."
Do (2): obliquely scan the article, periodically paying attention to the strange language of presentation and funny (semantic?) typos in style: & quot; charging effect" and the 'affect of systemic risks'.
Think (2): well, OK, as for a second year student (not a PhD student), forced to squeeze his speech into `` theses" – you can live. maybe a man joked about Friedman (I also liked to insert jokes into theses sometimes), and the editor was not sober and decided to rewrite fragments of the work to his taste. (Journal, by the way Russian, & quot; Founder: Scientific Information Publishing Center «Institute for Strategic Studies»").
Do (3): remove the article from the list & quot; view" and we are not coming back.
