Divi disease.

As soon as the people are not deceived. And all because of the illiteracy of the population, as few people understand in percentage, so cheat a novice investor just spit.

Found the webinar title on the Internet, decided to see what kind of schemer is this and how he will justify 63% per annum from dividends, when in the US market the annual dividend yield 2-3%. We will keep silent about the fact that on the day of the cut-off the price falls by the amount of dividends — let the illusion remain, let's not destroy it.

The technology of deception turned out to be primitive. He took schedule акции MCD (Mcdonald 's), whose shares for 10 years have grown from $45 to $120 with dividends of about 3%, and simply stated that if I bought these shares 10 years ago and would have kept them until today, you would have received in this time 63% per annum. apparently, everyone believed, since there were no objections to this in numerous comments.

In fact it is, certainly, none 63%, and approximately 10% annual plus 3% dividends = 13% per annum.

Well, the most important thing is that the main profit was obtained from changes in the share price., not from dividends. Dividend yield remained unchanged 3% per annum, but not at all 63% :)))

  Happy Special Operations Day everyone!!!!!
Scroll to Top