Tag: risk management

• About my alleged penchant for conspiracy theories and other mythical mutations.

I have nothing to do with this. Моё кредо в понимании рынка – это безусловная объективность. Мой идеологический кумир – это Ain Rend, who was obsessed with such a concept as objectivism. So I want to spit in the face of that one, who claims, that I am guided by some fictitious concepts for myself, which are not backed by anything.

I don't want to do education now, but I will say briefly:”Для меня существуют только 2 parties: покупатели и продавцы. As Gerchik says, nothing new has been invented on this score yet. This is the first fact. The second fact is, that money in the futures market flows from weak hands to strong, ie. если к примеру из накопления цена выходит вверх – совершенно очевидно, that sellers are in fact weak holders, and the buyers are strong. Logically? Logically.
Further. I affirm, что слабые деньги – это всегда толпа, ie. majority. Retail. Meat. Proof? Only facts: from 90% to 99% all traders merge. This is confirmed by the brokers themselves.. Accordingly, if from any accumulation the price shoots up- this means the maximum probability that, what are the shorts on the futures, которые являлись контрагентами покупателей – this is the crowd and it is she who is losing money now. Because. most trade at a loss. What the fuck is illogical here?
Соответственно кто являлся в тот момент контрагентом толпы – мне допи#ды. Я не провожу расследований на этот счет и мне это абсолютно не интересно и если я это узнаю – мне это никак не повысит мою доходность. They can be anyone in the moment and you can call him whatever you want: any professional. participant or market maker or invisible hand of the market or dolls or whatever your heart desires. But that's just the name of the other side, which turned out to be stronger in each specific situation. ВСЁ.

What am I making up here? What is not objective here?

• Утверждение, that my methods are similar to the classic ones. анализом, despite, that I reject him..

For me, such statements are humiliating.. Because. I am an ideologist of anti-classical approaches and my method is the opposite of what they write about in popular books.

I explain a brief essence:
Classics of those. analysis promotes that, что надо играть вместе с толпой. Я же пропагандирую, that you must always play against the crowd.
Why the classics are popular? Because for many years she really worked and even on liquid assets THE CROWD COULD MOVE THE MARKET. Accordingly, it was foolish to play against the movements.
What is the point of a classic breakout entry? Because at this very moment it becomes clear to the majority, where will exit from the flat, there was certainty, determined the vector. Therefore, at the moment of the breakdown, an imbalance of buyers and sellers was created., because. sellers could not provide instant liquidity to the mass of buyers who came. From here came the impulse. The market was inert.
Why did the triangle shape work?? For the same reason.

У меня же, for example, entry at the moment of breakdown strictly prohibited. Because. on modern platforms at this moment the balance is leveled by the market maker and the absence of sellers from the crowd no longer produces the former effect, ie. inert pulse. The market does not shoot out of the flat, but returns back to it and goes to the opposite border, where actually all the buyers' stops are.. where the fuck else can they be, это же очевидно.

You can agree with this, can you judge, но утверждать что мои методы подчиняются классике ТА – это просто клевета и настоящая ахинея.

Брать мои сделки и утверждать что они совпадают с сигналами по классике – могут только дибилоиды. Jetty, если я купил – так это ж очевидно, there in a moment the exit from the triangle occurred, and on the watch an upside-down head shoulders, and some moving line has broken through and a trend channel, which you can adjust as you like, and in general there, according to the daily timeframe, the flag formation and MACD entered the oversold zone and in general, there will be growth, because. positive macro statistics came out!!! IT'S FUCKING OBVIOUS, WHAT I TRADE CLASSIC TA, AND ALL THE HEADS!!!!!

• Outright lies about sitting out huge losses and systematic averaging..

This is an outright lie. Any student of mine, who saw my trade can confirm this.
I НИКОГДА I do not open a deal, in which my stop originally was more than my take profit. НИКОГДА. I strongly prohibit any such transactions..
Поэтому мои “огромные убытки” всегда соответствуют мои “огромным прибылям”.

I am very respectful of transactions, with the ratios 1:1. Because. it means, that all your advantage is in checkmate. expectation is based on an understanding of the market. Если оно есть – на дистанции вы будете в плюсе. You must be right just in >50% случаев и если это по факту так – то я не в коем случае не запрещаю такие входы. (I personally have it like that). The main thing is that they fit into risk management.
There is one more factor, which will benefit large, но обоснованных стопов – это то, what % losing trades will be stupidly less, than working with micro-stops. The fact, that systems with positive mat. ожиданием, в которых 1 прибыльная сделка отбивает десятки убыточных – в ручной торговле очень трудно выполнимы. Because. after a long series of losses, psychologically it is extremely fucking uncomfortable to take that very large profitable trade completely, but in practice it is simply impossible. In my head only 1 мысль – как бы отбить убытки и не более того))) So, the first profitable trade always closes ahead of time, what actually kills the very mate. ожидание. IMHO similar strategies are only for algorithmic traders.

Further. I never average. NEVER FUCK. Because. усреднение – это дополнительная сделка WITHOUT SIGNAL с одной единственной целью – AVERAGE LOSS and add to INITIAL POSITION at a better price.

Я же торгую only on system signals, which have a positive checkmate. ожидание, but sl-but they need to be included in everything without exception. А потому, if I am in any position and see that a completely separate entrance is being formed, with his foot and teak, не имеющий никакого отношения к предыдущему входу – я обязан в него войти. And it doesn't matter at all, my initial position is profitable or unprofitable. Hack this difference on your nose!

• What about my students aka turtles and their results..

I am ready to be responsible for all the actions I have taken and be responsible for my words..

I would like to separate those, who is simply trying to denigrate me or in some way convict me of unprofessionalism because of personal hostility and those, who really has objective reasons for this.

The first ones are very easy to identify. Если вы видите, что про меня размазывают грязь по форумам – оцените аргументы. Especially in dialogue with me. They are always based on the personality of the opponent., and not on the essence of the discussion, objective facts and logical reasoning.
За все время, которое я существую в информационном поле – я видел только таких, carrying unprecedented slander about me, it is not clear for some reason.

With the second category, I have the following algorithm:
IF EXISTING STUDENTS, PAST TRAINING WITH ME, WHICH MERGED AS A CONSEQUENCE BECAUSE OF MY SYSTEM – Я НЕ ТОЛЬКО ХОЧУ, I REQUIRE YOU TO BE HEARD BY THE PUBLIC. ЕСЛИ ТАКИЕ ИМЕЮТСЯ – Я ПУБЛИЧНО ЗАФИКСИРУЮ ЭТОТ ФАКТ В ОТДЕЛЬНОМ ПОСТЕ И ОН НИКОГДА НЕ БУДЕТ УДАЛЕН!!

My system implies rules for entering and exiting a position and essno risk management.

That's why, если кто-то слил свой депо – значит одно из двух: or the transactions violated the rules of the system, or you took an exorbitant risk on every trade, for example MORE 10-20% от депо.
Absolutely obvious, that any system allows single unprofitable trades and generates income only at a distance, therefore, only an idiot can reproach the trading system by draining a third of the account on one deal. I myself used to be systematically that idiot, but, извините меня, I only blamed myself for it, not a market or a system or anyone else.

That's why, if anyone has a claim against me, озвученные выше – пожалуйста, screenshots of transactions in kammenty and broker reports. Клянусь, no such comment will be removed or hidden. Если ваши действия на торговом счете проходят оба условия – я публично признаю свою некомпетентность.

p.S.

Therefore, I want to say the following: NOBODY IS IN THE RIGHT approve, that my approach to trading is fucking or bullshit, even in a theoretical aspect.
If anyone thinks, что имеет право – пожалуйста, I am ready to enter into a public or non-public discussion on this matter. And not only ready, I've been waiting for a person for several years, which would, pointed me out to any logical or practical flaws in my method and would suggest something more efficient. It's in my best interest, but I have never met such people.